Three Board members had prohibited interests in contracts that the District awarded totaling more than $22 million.

BOCES officials did not properly monitor and account for 66 percent of the 76 fixed assets we examined, including security cameras, computers, tools and equipment.

Corporation officials did not provide adequate approval and oversight of the revolving loan program.

Town officials established and implemented adequate procedures to ensure the Court fines and fees we reviewed were properly collected, deposited, disbursed and reported in an accurate and timely manner.

District officials did not establish adequate controls over network user accounts and settings.

The Board did not provide adequate oversight of the Treasurer's financial operations.

District officials did not always use a competitive process to procure goods, services or professional services or ensure no conflicts of interest existed.

The Board did not effectively manage the District's financial condition and presented budgets that gave taxpayers the impression that the District needed to both increase real property taxes and use appropriated fund balance to close projected budget gaps. As a result, more real property taxes were levied than needed to fund operations.

The Board did not ensure that non-payroll disbursements were appropriately procured, properly audited and approved, adequately supported and for valid District purposes.

The Board and officials did not properly approve and monitor projects or take action when goals were not met.

District officials did not establish adequate controls over the District's user accounts to prevent unauthorized use, access and/or loss.

The Board did not provide appropriate oversight and management of budgets and fund balance, or ensure annual audits were completed. More real property taxes were assessed than necessary to fund operations each year.

The Supervisor did not maintain complete, accurate and timely financial records and reports, and the Board did not ensure there were no prohibited conflicts of interest.

District officials did not solicit competition for professional services.

The Village's check signing process does not comply with Village policy. The Village Treasurer (Treasurer) did not maintain control of her electronic signature.

City officials properly planned and monitored the Project.

District officials did not implement adequate IT controls over the District Office's network to safeguard personal, private and sensitive information (PPSI).

The Board and District officials did not ensure the IT assets and data were safeguarded.

The Board did not effectively manage fund balance.

The Board did not establish adequate controls over District financial activities to safeguard assets.